Health content written to rank rather than to help is one of the reasons this market is confusing. These are the rules we work to.
Sourcing
Every figure carries a source and a date in the text, not in a footnote nobody reads. We prefer primary sources: the official state gazette, the Ministry of Health, regional health authorities, the national statistics institute, ISAPS, the Royal College of Surgeons, BAAPS, and the Advertising Standards Authority. Where we could not verify something, we say so rather than rounding it into a claim.
Medical review
Clinical content is reviewed by doctors licensed in Spain, named on the page with their medical college and registration number. Reviewers have no influence over which clinics are listed or where they appear.
Independence
No clinic reviews our content about its own treatments. No clinic sees an article before publication. We accept no payment for editorial coverage of any kind.
Corrections
Anyone can report an error, including the clinics themselves. Substantive corrections are marked on the page with the date and what changed. We do not quietly edit and move on.
Prescription-only medicines
Botulinum toxin is a prescription-only medicine. In the United Kingdom, advertising a prescription-only medicine to the public is prohibited and the Advertising Standards Authority treats almost any public reference to the brand as promotion. Because a large share of our readers are British, we use the term anti-wrinkle injections, and botulinum toxin where a clinical term is needed. We explain the whole thing in a dedicated guide.
What we are not
We are not a clinic. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and nothing on this site replaces a consultation with a registered doctor.
